Lobbying Blog Post #4: Funding for After School Programs


Screen Shot 2011-12-20 at 8.16.55 PM

Natalie Sanchez

To communicate my lobbying action to the decision makers concerning after school programs in Philadelphia, I decided to call the two women in charge after school programs in Philadelphia and e-mail the president of the After school Activities Partnerships (ASAP), Marciene Mattleman. In my e-mail to Marciene Mattleman, I let her know my purpose for contacting her and asked her a few questions about how after school programs worked: 1.) Where do funds for after school programs come from in these times where a lot of the money dedicated to school programs are being cut? 2.) What does it take to run/establish an after school program? 3.) What can I do to support or help out the after school programs that already exist in Philadelphia? No only did I e-mail Ms. Marciene Mattleman, but I also took an extra step and called the one of the two women that are in charge of the after school programs in Philadelphia, Ms. Iris Howard. I found her information on the Philadelphia City Council’s website. She did not respond my phone call yet, but I left her a message with a short summary of my purpose for calling and gave her my contact information for follow up. I am still waiting for a response from both of these contacts. 


I was originally just going to contact my local recreation building, as they offer after school programs for the neighborhood children, to lobby my cause, but I then decided to speak with the people who have more power over the decisions made about the school programs in our city. This way, I would get my point across in a more direct, personal, and stronger way. If I were to have contacted my local recreation center, I would have only spoken with one of the many heads of after school programs in Philadelphia; I would have only covered one out of the ten districts of Philadelphia. This would have gotten me only a fraction of the way into what I want to accomplish-more funding towards after school programs of Philadelphia. 


In order to follow up with my two contacts, I will wait for them to respond to my phone calls and emails. I have already taken the first step of speaking with them and introducing myself to them, now I just have to present my case to them. I will do this by finding other groups of people, possibly Philadelphia towns people, including children and parents who also want funding for after school programs in our city. I might take my lobbying a step further by actually visiting city council with other people with similar goals to mine, and actually speaking directly with Ms. Iris Howard and Anne Marie Dunne about funding for after school programs. I will have my lobbying partners present their personal experiences and reasons why they need these services, and will then present my reason for why it is beneficial to fund these programs. If this does not work, then I will need  a stronger voice to represent my cause and might have to contact my district council member, Mr. Frank DiCicco. If I can communicate my lobbying cause to him, he will have more of a chance of getting word to the other council members, and there might be more funding for after school programs. 


I feel that speaking to strong decision makers concerning lobbying topics is the most direct and strongest way to make progress. I feel however, that since we are high school students and since there are so many other different situations going on in city council, congress, and the supreme court that our lobbying causes are going to be overlooked. We would have a better chance of being heard if we join a group of people who have a similar cause as us or if we can get someone with a lot of power in government to represent us. Otherwise, we are all just numbers without a voice or representation. 


Comments