Annotations
Annotations
1.) Buchanico, C. (2013). Interview on neighborhood quality.
This source was the
interview that I had with my mother. In this interview we covered various
points about how she’s seen that the neighborhood has changed over the course
of her 15 years living here. Seeing as she stays in the neighborhood much more
than my father, I asked her about how the house has stood the test of time and
if she’s seen any significant changes in the housing and town quality over the
course of this time period. She told me that the changes that she saw weren’t
anything too big, but the water systems in the houses had been falling apart,
and that the only thing that had happened to the houses were some slightly bad
things such as small cracks and some inside parts of the house such as minor
water damage in certain portions of the house.
2.) Buchanico, A. (2013). Interview on street condition.
This was the interview that I had with my dad. I
realized that since my dad travels about more, he could be able to tell me how
Philadelphia was in comparison to other neighborhoods. He also is a police
officer so e gets a lot of driving done. I used this to my advantage to see
about the street conditions and tell me about the changes and transitions
between neighborhoods and how the neighborhoods look. He began telling me about
how as he’s been driving more, he doesn’t really see back roads and actual
neighborhood streets being repaired too commonly. He told me that the
transitions to some neighborhoods are subtle, but some are pretty big, going
from small broken down houses to grand houses tat have been around for hundred
of years. He says that he thinks it has to do with the people living in those
areas.
3.) Money, Kate. "Is Philadelphia the new
Brooklyn."brokelyn. N.p.. Web.
16 Feb 2013. <http://brokelyn.com/brooklyn-vs-philadelphia/>.
This link is discussing how
Philadelphia is a cheaper Brooklyn, and states the pluses and downsides about
moving to Philadelphia after being in Manhattan. Although a good portion of
this isn’t obviously relevant, it does show some good points. 1 being that the
monthly cost to live in Philly is significantly cheaper than many other places.
You also cannot find a job here, as the unemployment rate is sadly large.
Another semi-relevant has to do with the section known, as “you are more likely
to get murdered in Philly.” Murder and other serious crimes can be a good cause
of neglect in a neighborhood. These can spark signal crimes such as tagging and
doing damage to windows and other parts of housing. One of these happening at a
time may not seem like a big deal as the window can just be fixed. However, if
these are to constantly happen, then some things just won’t be stopped so soon.
4.) . "Neighborhood Transformation
Initiative." GoogleDocs. Neighborhood
Transformation Initiative. Web. 16 Feb 2013.
<https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.phila.gov/ohcd/conplan31/strategy.pdf>.
This link is a Google doc by
the neighborhood transformation initiative. It states part of what we are
saying which is that the state of Philadelphia’s housing was and still is in
decline. Low-income communities contribute to inability for repair in these
neighborhoods. The main point of this document seems like it’s talking about
using a planning idea for the most part. Which isn’t exactly largely helpful in
discussing our point, but if we were to discuss the solution at this point it
is without a doubt necessary to have planning included in your steps, as it’s
necessary for basically any process of recovery.
5.) L. Kelling, George. "Broken Windows." Theatlantic. Theatlantic. Web. 19 Feb 2013.
<http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/
The
broken window theory is a story that states signal crimes and other small
factors contribute to the decline of a civilization. And it also discusses how
to at least give off a better and safer look for a town. This article
specifically describes New Jersey’s attempt at a nice neighborhood program by
stationing foot patrol units all around the town to give people the feeling of
safety and hopefully helping to lower the crime rate. While the cops did not
like this, as it was more difficult to get around and signal other police due
to lack of transportation and technology in the car, people felt safer. Crime
rates didn’t change, but due to something known as order-maintenance, people
were able to feel like they were being cared for much more.
Comments
No comments have been posted yet.
Log in to post a comment.