Fossils: How much do they indicate? Do they tell the whole story?

Tajh Jenkins

Science & Society

First Quarter Benchmark


Research Question: How much information do fossils indicate about a species evolution? Do they tell the whole story?

I changed my question because my original question just wasn't working out. 

Fossils are witness to the discontinuity, the complexity and the stability of past life forms. When it comes to evolution, fossils are viewed as one of the most important sources of information about the Earth’s past as well as different species past. Fossils are indicators of age (age of rocks and species and animals in which they are found), Earth movements (such as mountain building), ancient geography (former positions of continents), past environments (what the environment was like when the fossil organisms were alive), and the evolution of life (the evolution of life on earth). Fossils give us a showing of Earth’s long history and the all of the changes that it and its species have experienced.

 

Based on this information one would think that fossils are probably the most reliable source of evolution. That is not true. Over time, fossil records have been misinterpreted and have not been able to tell the whole story of evolution. Scientist have been able to point out gaps in fossil record history, proving that some fossil theories are invalid. They say that fossil records fail to illustrate what are called “Transitional Forms” which are the in-between stages of a creature that evolved into another.

 

Fossil records surely do have gaps because of the conditions required to create fossils have been rare ever since life began on earth. A small percentage of animals that have lived and died have become fossils. Many puzzles of the pieces are missing and some may not be found. With that being said, scientists have been able to discover the evolutionary transitions between fish and amphibians, reptiles and mammals, dinosaurs and birds, and lineages such as whales and horses. Fossils have always proved to show existence, but it’s not consistent in showing evolution.

 

When we look at a fossil it doesn’t tell use where it came from or how it was formed. That why fossils still allow us to ask questions about its origin, we can suggest answer these questions by discovering circumstantial evidences.


Resources that helped me:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/21586403/What-Does-a-Fossil-Tell-Us
http://www.icr.org/article/real-nature-fossil-record/
http://www.ucg.org/booklets/EV/creation-evolution-fossil-record.asp
http://www.trilobita.de/english/intro.html

http://www.biologos.org/questions/fossil-record/

Comments