Is the U.S. a helping hand? by Vincent Russell
Does the U.S. actually help when it says
its helping? Or do they do what ever they can to help? Let me explain. In the
recent news the revolution in Libya has received some help from the United
States and the United Nations.
Lately, they bombed government factories and government hangers hoping
to stop Qadaffi’s reign of terror.
They hoped to give the rebels an edge on the government forces since
they are barley making any headway. Many think this is going way to far to try
to help the people of Libya. Many
more think this is exactly what is needed to stop him. Is the U.S. helping the people Libya?
Or are they helping their suffering?
The U.S. in particular has been in question of whether or not its
actually helping when it says its “helping”. Foreign Aid’s objective is to benefit countries by
volunteering goods and services.
According to globalissues.org,
in 1970 “the world’s richest countries agreed to give 0.7% of their gross
national income as official international development aid, annually”. Many
of the countries in this agreement do not meet with this criterion. As of 2009 the U.S. has been giving
0.2% of their gross income. Although, this does not meet the requirements the
U.S is ahead 15 million dollars on other countries.
In
January 2010 a devastating 7M earthquake hit Haiti. Of course being the kind
country that we are we sent 10,000 troops in the next few days following the
earthquake. Our Military leaders
were too interested in securing the island to send groups like the Red Cross
overseas first. According to
Slate, a news website, “Aid flights from Mexico
Russia and France were refused to land” on the 18th of January. It took convincing from the U.N. to let
airdropped aid reach Haitian soil.
Lt. General of the U.S. southern command told Associated Press “It is
calm at this time”. If it was calm
couldn’t the forces be more directed toward giving aid to people?
Three weeks ago a 9M earthquake hit Japan
followed by a ruinous wall of water that crippled the entire coastline up to 6
miles inward. Since Japan is an
important ally to the U.S., a relief effort was made to help the people of
Japan bounce back from this two part natural disaster. 20,000
troops were sent to Japan. Some of
the 20,000 Marines cleared the Sendai airport, the biggest regional city hit by
these calamities. Now airplanes
with supplies can land and deliver aid. "But I still have reservations
about having U.S. troops in Japan. ... I'm happy today, and I appreciate their
help, but it doesn't fundamentally change the way I feel", says Yoko
Hiraoka from STL today. Even
though the U.S is making a good effort to get supplies there, their presence
holds tensions of conflict.
With
all this evidence before us can we make a definitive judgment? The U.S. feels
obligated to help other countries even if the ties with them are bad. The U.S. makes mistakes by over
estimating the problems, like what happened in Haiti, and tries to not show
them. All in all, this help is great for countries that need support in times
of need. It shows decency to help
Japan even though the ties are bad.
Just sometimes the U.S. goes about this wrongly but never the less it is
help and it is needed. Even though
it doesn’t seem beneficial it actually is helping a lot, more than we know or think.
Comments
No comments have been posted yet.
Log in to post a comment.