First of all, I love this book and it's interests me that you wrote a paper about how the setting relates to the content of the novel. Some of these points are very well iterated with a powerful command of language. However, there are a few grammatical errors and also gaps in knowledge, meaning that you are assuming the reader knows more than he or she knows. Instead of jumping into a scene to prove your point, you should state your sub-thesis then pull a specific example from the book (in a quote, character analysis etc) and explain how it backs up your thesis. This will also make your analysis more clear and thorough.
Comments (1)
Log in to post a comment.