• Log In
  • Log In
Science Leadership Academy @ Center City
Science Leadership Academy @ Center City Learn · Create · Lead
  • Students
    • Mission and Vision
  • Parents
  • Community
    • Mission and Vision
  • Calendar

Kristina Chiev Public Feed

Globalization in Philadelphia

Posted by Kristina Chiev in Globalization - Laufenberg on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 at 8:18 am
This is my globalization benchmark about how America and Philadelphia has been globalized. Here is the link to my BM presentation.

The most challenging thing about this benchmark was connected globalization to Philadelphia. I knew things that I wanted to put up but I didn't know how to write how it did connect to Philadelphia. The easiest part for me was obtaining the images. Most of my images had me in it and others were easy to get since the places wasn't that far from my house. Out of all my pictures, my favorite has to be the one on the society slide. It's a picture of my family(1/8 of them) and I, in the temple praying together as a family. 

I think the evidence of globalization in Philadelphia isn't that hard to see if you live in a certain neighborhood. I live in the Khmer community of South Philadelphia, so it was easy to see where my family and my culture has globalized Philadelphia. I can't tell if it's more or less than other countries but I think it's less because my family in California says their Khmer community is bigger than the one here and that people would go all out during News Years.
Be the first to comment.

12 year old in Cambodia

Posted by Kristina Chiev in Globalization - Laufenberg on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 4:38 pm
This is the link to my story.

The life of a 12 year old Cambodian is hard to watch from afar. When I was 12, I was working hard in school to make my family proud and also working hard because I knew I needed to try my best if I wanted to support my family when I grew up. Here, this 12 year old is working in the worse possible conditions for money that can barely support his family, but every cent counted. This was new to me though, because my family used to live this life back in Cambodia. My great grandparents died from starvation to support my grandma and her brothers and sisters because they knew they will last longer than they would. The hard part for me was actually looking at the pictures. When this 12 year old is 40, he will still have the same tough life as he is having now because Cambodia doesn't have much funds for their people and nearly 60% of the population lives in poverty. He will either be providing for his own family, but 14 hours or more of labor will be the same for him because he knows if he stops for one bit, someone else will get the money that he needs.

Be the first to comment.

3rd Quarter BM and Reflection

Posted by Kristina Chiev in Globalization - Laufenberg on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 at 8:31 am
This is my 3rd quarter benchmark. I did a compare and contrast between Belize vs. Japan. 

Reflection

The countries I picked were Japan and Belize. Japan is located in East Asia and recently had a tsunami and an earthquake. It is one of the technologies driven country in the world but this disaster has severely damaged them. The Belize is located in Central America. Belize has been dealing with a lot of environmental damages with deforestation and also extreme climate changes with hurricanes.

      For my benchmark, I did a compare and contrast with Japan and Belize, and also individually gave them a ranking for 5 different categories. When I first started, I did Japan first because the tsunami was so recent, and it was easy to get information about their environment and how their society is dealing with the environment. But for climate change, it was hard for me to do that because I didn’t know if a tsunami could be considered a climate change, so I kicked that to the side and looked at climate changes from the 1990’s up to 2010. Other than that, I think Japan was interesting to do since I got to learn about the deeper aspects of how they are dealing with their current situation. Belize wasn’t that hard for me to find information because when I looked up climate change on google, it automatically went to hurricanes in Central America and also I found out that Belize’s neighbors were their friendly trade partners, so it was easy deciding on hostile neighbors ranking.

Environmental damage for Belize and Japan was easy to figure out since a lot of their environmental damages was either recent, or going on for a long time. Climate change for Belize was easy for me to find, but Japan’s was harder for me because I was looking at the current times and didn’t know if a tsunami was considered to start from climate change, so I had to look at the climate change from the 1990’s to 2010 and found that the climate changes went up the roof from long ago. Hostile neighbors were also pretty easy for me because Belize’s neighbors were their friendly trade partners and for Japan, it was mainly surrounded by water and their neighbors were their friendly trade partners besides North Korea. Friendly trade partners for Japan was easy for me because Japan is known as one of the most technology driven countries in the world so it was likely they had a lot of trade partners who were interested in their items and technology. For Belize, it was kind of easy also because they seemed to like to do local trades with the countries around them. Last was society’s response to their environmental damage, which was a little easy. Because Japan’s situation wasn’t so long ago, it was easy to find news reports of how Japan is dealing with their situation, then for Belize, I had to look in deeper to see how they were fixing their environment and found out that environmental rebuilding was a part of the school’s curricular.

If I could change one thing about my product, I think I would of picked maybe better pictures or wrote more words because I think I don’t have enough words but also I didn’t want my project to be mainly words, I wanted the pictures to convey what was going on around the world.

This project was really fun because I got to know more about other countries and see how they are dealing with their society compared to how we deal with ours when in the same situation.

Be the first to comment.

5(6) Photo story

Posted by Kristina Chiev in Globalization - Laufenberg on Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 9:31 am
This is my 6 photo story about Belize. All the pictures are from flickr, and I hope you enjoy the story.
Be the first to comment.

Quarter 2 Benchmark

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 7:09 am
Here is the link to my Q2 benchmark
SampleDL
SampleDL
The reasons I picked the 12 topics i picked is because they all effected me in some way that really hurt my life and damaged some of the things that I was able and not able to do. At first it was easy to pick which laws, cases, and offices but the hardest part was thinking what part of my life did it affect. I was always jammed up at how it effected my life and was it really a direct effect or a indirect effect. After doing this benchmark I think my life will be more affected by the government because I have a feeling the laws that are set now against the teenagers, the age limits might go up. Then again, it might just stay where it is seeing how society status with teenagers and drunk driving is going so far. This benchmarked helped me realize some bad decisions the government has made and how it has severely effected my life and somewhat traumatized me. 
Be the first to comment.

Final blog post

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Friday, January 14, 2011 at 1:25 pm
​For my final blogpost, I wanted to contact state representatives that agreed with "fixing" the 14th amendment and sent emails to them asking if it was really "fixed" would any of this affect people in state college and student's scholarship and the tuition of state colleges. I haven't received an answer from State Representative of PA, Daryl Metcalfe yet so I will just be uploading the email that I sent him.

"Daryl Metcalfe,
I have left an email before asking you questions and was wondering if you can answer a few more questions for me. Here are some of the questions that I've been thinking about lately. If the 14th amendment is successfully "fixed" do you think this will affect college students in any way? What I mean by the question is will student's tuition be effected and why do you think that. Thank you for your time and consideration, I hope to hear from you soon.
Kristina Chiev"

I am hoping to get an answer back from his views and thought and try to share it with the class because we are heading to college next year and if this somehow gets through, I want to see if it will really effect us.
Be the first to comment.

Obtaining a building permit in Philadelphia

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Friday, December 17, 2010 at 12:32 pm

In American Government, we were given a task to pick a bureaucracy and make a flow chart on the steps of that bureaucracy. The partner I picked was Beth and we decided on doing the steps to obtaining a building permit in Philadelphia. 

We picked this topic without knowing what we were getting ourselves into and didn't know even one step of obtaining a building permit in Philadelphia. The first thing we did was head to google and googled, "building permit in Philadelphia" and came across this site, 100k house, that told us the steps of obtaining a building permit and what each paper/form that needed to be filled out, meant. Then we headed to Philadelphia L&I site to obtain the application and started to fill it out the best way we knew how to.

The paperwork that we had to fill out was very confusing. The paper work needed to be filled out by other people and you have had to contact these people before starting the application. Then you also had to fill out papers like, Zoning permit application, structural design criteria, energy conservation, and more. Most of these paperwork had to be filled out by a hired engineer/architect firm and a lot of contacting.

I don't think I would change anything because even though these steps are so complicated and has a lot of steps, it's made for safety. The city has to be on par with what you are doing because one wrong step/move, someone who wasn't involved, will get hurt.

Flowchart link: http://www.lucidchart.com/documents/edit/4d08c727-33f0-41dc-ab32-7f0f0afcbe04

Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.36.46 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.36.46 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.37.08 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.37.08 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.37.32 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.37.32 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.37.42 PM
Screen shot 2010-12-17 at 1.37.42 PM
Be the first to comment.

Blog post 4

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 9:53 pm

Today I emailed PA state representative, Daryl Metcalfe and asked about his views on anchor babies. This is the email I sent to him:

Daryl Metcalfe,

My name is Kristina Chiev and I am a student at Science Leadership Academy, a public high school in Philadelphia. In my America Government class, everyone was given an assignment to pick a topic that interested them the most. I came across "anchor babies" while researching and became very interested in this issue. I've found your name as my state representative and was wondering if you can tell me your stance on the issue of children born from illegal immigrants and their effects on America financially. 
Thank you for your time and consideration, I hope to hear from you soon.
Kristina Chiev

And the reply was:

Thank you for your email.

I personally receive and read the communications that are sent to this address.

I appreciate the time that you have taken to contact me. 

If your message expresses your view on legislation or a specific policy, please be assured that your input will be considered.

You will be contacted by one of my staff if you have sent a constituent service request or have shared a concern that requires further action by my office.

Serving the 12th District,
Daryl Metcalfe
State Representative
Pennsylvania House of Representatives

Then a 2nd reply:

Dear Ms. Chiev,
 
Representative Metcalfe asked that I e-mail you regarding your interest in researching the anchor baby issue. Please see the below press release sent from his office October 19th.
 
For additional information and press releases please visit RepMetcalfe.com and StateLegislatorsforLegalImmigration.com.
 

If Representative Metcalfe can be of assistance to you in the future with any state-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact his office.

 

Sincerely,

 

Samantha Clarke, Legislative Assistant

State Representative Daryl Metcalfe

12th Legislative District

At the end of the email, he sent a press conference release document on his opinion of illegal immigrants and I found it very helpful

I think I will email him again soon on the steps of making this aware to others and also how would I effectively present this information to others without starting a fight or arguement

Be the first to comment.

Lobbying blog post #3

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 10:42 pm

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, is supporter this decision to somehow take care of these “anchor babies”. Right now many take this as a negative issue because it’s separating a child from their parents or others say that they had to struggle to even sneak in, so they should stay. Then there is also good media attention from news station saying how much these babies cost just to be born in America, and tax payers’ are responsible to pay for this bill that the hospital has for giving birth to the child. During my research, I haven’t ran into any people against this law that has power, but some people I found a while back, were professors at universities that said something like, “there is a solution, we just have to make one.” Even all the research about how much we are wasting on giving birth to “anchor babies”, there hasn’t been a policy put out, but the thing is, I don’t think a policy would really reinforce this to make it work. 

Rep. Steve King plays a big role in this because he is part of the house in some way. He can get his subcommittee to agree with this and then convince the committee to pass it on and show the legislative branch how much money we are spending on “anchor babies”

People who might care to hear about this subject are U.S. taxpayers, which is about everyone living in the States. Many people don't know that a hospital wastes about $30,000 to deliver a child and that hospital bill is paid from money from the taxpayers. If they knew that their money is going to children that technically are not supposed to be here, they might have a change of mind.

There is no time frame as of now, but I am hoping to contact a representative that agrees with my thinking to talk about where is most of the money from tax payers is going to.

Be the first to comment.

Blog post #2

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 9:19 am

Blog Post #2

Just to recap what “Anchor Babies” are, are babies that are born from “illegal” immigrants. There are many controversies made about how they shouldn’t gain U.S. citizenship because their parents were not born in America and they were illegally here, while giving birth to their child, just so they had an excuse to stay in America.


“Anchor Babies” is a hot topic in America currently. A law that is being introduced that is trying to stop the babies from staying in the U.S. is bill H.R.1868 - Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009. Some say that this topic is connected to the Arizona law because both are trying to limit the amount of illegal immigrants in the states. Some find that “anchor babies” abuses the amendment because the 14th amendment states that  if you're born here, and you're not a diplomat's child, then you become a citizen. This way of getting into the country also seems demeaning towards the child. It’s like the child was made to be used for the parents selfishness, than being born out of love between 2 people.


The two senators that represents PA is Senator Robert Cassey and Senator Arlen Spector. The representative for Pennsylvania’s 1st congressional district is District 1 Robert Brady.


Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (above on the left side) says that the 14th amendment lets “foriegn” invaders, cross our borders and violate our laws. He takes it to heart how much these “invaders” are actually taking money from the U.S. citizens taxes, and the majority of the tax money are going to the “invaders” welfare checks instead of to the U.S. citizens benefit of fixing roads, getting supplies for schools, fixing schools, or even creating more jobs for the country. He has voted to agree with the new “anchor baby” law, which is, one of the parents must be a legal U.S. citizen, a documented resident who was allowed in the country, or the child of a alien (documented resident) who is in the military or navy.


Between the legistators and I, we both have the same views that illegal immigrants are spending money that can be spent on us, the U.S. citizens. There are many people here legally that are in poverty but the majority of the tax money going to welfares, are going to the illegal immigrants and their child. Also that if they wanted into the country, they should do it the legal way. It might take longer than crossing a border, but it’s worth it in a long run.


Extra information, “In 2009, San Bernardino County spent $64 million providing welfare benefits to U.S.-born children of illegal aliens.”
Be the first to comment.

Blog post #1

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 9:18 am


My lobby topic that I have chosen is “Anchor Babies.” Anchor babies, are babies that are born from “illegal” immigrants. They are born and known as U.S. citizens, but once they are born, the parents are to leave the country, until the child is 21 years old. Once the child is 21 years old, he/she can apply for a US Visa for their parents. I am lobbying to keep the law that has been put forth.

My motivation for picking this topic, is that I find this law beneficial to the U.S. Each birth in the U.S. increases the U.S. citizen’s tax. This will effect the economy because tax money are usually used for school or fixing the city, but instead they are being put to use by paying for the welfare cost of illegal immigrants. Not only that, but the term “Anchor Babies” are used in a way to say that the only reason why the person having the baby in America, is to use it as an excuse to stay in America. Usually we wouldn’t suspect a women with a baby to be an illegal immigrant, we would just think, “what a cute baby”.
The main supporters of the law, are state legislators that are sick of seeing the tax money going towards babies born from illegal immigrants in their state, than using it to fix up their state’s school systems and supplies.  Also people who agree with the Arizona law supports this law because it will help keep the illegal migration rate down.

The opposing supporters, might be supporters people who see this topic in a personal perspective. Some are mothers and fathers, or even kids who were born here by their illegal immigrant parents.


Some extra information about anchor babies is that, in 2003, at Stockton, California, 70% of 2,300 babies were anchor babies.

Be the first to comment.

Q1 Benchmark

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at 8:20 am
This is a story i've made up about the Anchor Baby Law which is also called "Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009.

Backstory: Illegal immigrants cross the border and give birth to a child. That child is called an anchor baby.


Anchor Babies Law_Page_1
Anchor Babies Law_Page_1
Anchor Babies Law_Page_2
Anchor Babies Law_Page_2
Anchor Babies Law_Page_3
Anchor Babies Law_Page_3
Anchor Babies Law_Page_4
Anchor Babies Law_Page_4
Anchor Babies Law_Page_5
Anchor Babies Law_Page_5
Be the first to comment.

2010 Election Interview

Posted by Kristina Chiev in American Government - Laufenberg on Tuesday, November 2, 2010 at 6:51 pm

​Today, I decided to go with Robbie Glynn to a local polling spot around our house. At first I was thinking of going alone, but since it was Robbie's first time voting, I thought I would go with him to cheer and found out his mom was also voting, so I asked her could I interview her after she finished voting and she was happy to. I went to Robbie's house to wait for his mom and when she got home, we started the interview. (you said I couldn't interview robbie, but nothing about his mom :])


Interview Questions
Q: What motivated you to come out and vote?
A: I felt it was my duty and responsibility to come out and vote

Q: Do you vote in every election?
A: Yes, I vote in every election.

Q: Do you know why we vote on Tuesday?
A: No, I do not know why

Q: Where have you encountered the highest amount of ad campaigning?
A: TV but the most annoying is phones. They keep calling and calling

Q: What was the most memorable campaign ad that you have encountered?
A: Most memorable was when Dan Onorato introduces his name and then it was used against him. Like the commercial would say something like, "who raises tax" or something like that and then they would use Dan Onorato's ad as the replay to that question, "Dan Onorato"

Q: Are you always sure of who you are going to vote for when you walk into the booth or are you still deliberating?
A: Yes, I know who I will vote for before I go to vote

Q: Did you learn about voting in school? If yes, did that impact your willingness to vote today?
A: Yes, I found it my responsibility 
Image023
Image023
Be the first to comment.
RSS
Science Leadership Academy @ Center City · Location: 1482 Green St · Shipping: 550 N. Broad St Suite 202 · Philadelphia, PA 19130 · (215) 400-7830 (phone)
×

Log In