Violence is powerful but non-violence initiates action. For example actually I have no example, but I will explain my reasoning. If you are violent law officials will see you as silent and easy tagets, but if you are non-violent there only strategy is no longer effective and they must give you what you need.If you are non-violent this awaken the opposing party and tells them "no this is not a joke." Both of these acts of resistance will have consequence, but one will be less painful.

My Faith in non-violence by Mohanda K. Ghandi

"I have found that life persist in the midst if destruction and, therefore there must be a higher law than that of destruction... I have found, however, that this law of love has answered as the law of destruction has never done."

Ghandi's response to non-violence was not only plausible, but soothing. I have heard of him only when being compared to American activist ie. Doctor King. But actually hearing/reading his views makes me think of new ways we can end violence today.

The basic ideas of colonialism was a global trade with a purpose

India, Malaya, Dutch Indies, Ceylon and the Philippines were rich in natural resources.

If you had enough land for your family and were told to grow crops for Europe then you would begin starving due to you losing crops.

When a colony was made they threw anyone in it forcing them to co-exist

Turned colonies against each other

Used bribes and small steps when taking over the colonies

Europe is getting most of the profit

Made the asians that if they had lighter skin then you were better and more beautiful.

Europe controlled over 84% of the world

Questions

Does colonialism still exist or is it over

How can you strive when your overseers have given up

​Quotes about religion 
Respond to one (agree, disagree, connections)

Religion is the sign of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the sould of soul- less conditions. It is the opium of the people- Karl Max. 1884

I agree with this because back then, a lot of people feel the negative passion of endanger of the other society when they have different religion. No one cares about the other group of people. They think about themselves and the world is segregated because people believe in different things. I believe that everyone has a leader; therefore it brings people together. For example, famous people will tell the people in the society not to do non violence because its a better reputations of not doing any sinful things. I think there is one God, but people see it with different types of God when there are more than one religion. 

It causes violences because there ar war happening. Religion have different myths where people do different things. 

​Historic Map Islam 

Year 1: Middle Asia are spread into  6 tribes. 
Kingdah spread most part in Asia.



Year 2: The ottoman Empire is located in Anatolia, Rumelia, Wallachia, etc in 1481 

Egypt and Syria are Acquisitions up to 1520. 


Year 3: Religion are spreaded throughout the world in middle east, half Africa and some countries in South America.

Indonesia have a boom time (growing) because of the Muslim.

What is the best way to adress global inequality?

The best way to adress global inequality is to give every race the same oppurtunity and pay. Another way is to not judge people by their religion, or their beliefs, because they could be jsut like you, but just a different religion. Also, places that are over populated should have more that what places that ae less populated have.

WHich is more powerful, violence or nonviolence?

I believe that violence is more powerful even though in most cases it is not appropriate to use. I say this because people get what they want fast and more efficient if the use violence . Violence is also more powerful because you gain a lot of respect from people even though most people would categorize it as fear. 


v
-over power people
-gets to ending
-forces things to change
-leads to destruction 
-large audience 


NV
-Shows control
-leads to changing mind

May 1, 2013
History journal #39


I think that violence is more powerful because although people may get hurt or killed, their point got heard in a powerful way. If one didn't act out and only spoke, it wouldn't make a difference. People have to take action When a large fight breaks out, more and more people will know about it rather than just giving a speech. Actions always speak louder than words.

       Violence                                                                        Non violence 
- Can over power people                                                    - Shows control and power
- Gets to an ending                                                           - Changes the way one thinks
- Forces things to change                                                   - More persuasion 
- Shows how serious it is                                                    - Initiates action
- Leads to destruction
- Larger audience 

​This is a play that I created based on someone's perspective on the Keystone Pipeline. 
https://vimeo.com/51456034
 

This is my response to a revolution unit that was taught in class and some information of the assignment along with it. 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p_EQ2KBeWW4f5YaWlOAOB3rH4eXum9aqFPCKEOqikp0/edit?usp=sharing