AJohnson Process Paper
My
capstone addresses the SLA core values in many ways. For one, collaboration was
a major, if not integral, portion of my capstone. It was often necessary to
reach out to coworkers to give feedback on my proposal as well as research
paper. I also had to gain the backing of a knowledgeable team. With a great
team behind me, it was easy to move forward with conducting our research.
Another very important piece of this project was research. Countless hours were
spent understanding the water hyacinth plant, removal and disposal methods, and
its anatomy. This information was vital to properly conducting the project.
Understanding the growth pattern of water hyacinth along with the tidal
patterns of the Delaware made conducting research easier. In terms of the value
of presentation and reflection, a great deal of attention was paid to the
detail within the research paper. After reading some other published research
papers on water hyacinth and its applications, I made sure that my paper was
read over by many pairs of eyes. This ensured the quality of the project was
evident in its documentation.
To
complete this capstone, four steps were followed. Research, comprehension,
application, reflection. These steps were used countless times during the
process of my capstone. Research was used to layer the basic understanding of
all elements incorporated into my capstone. From understanding scientific
measurements of the biology of a river to using probes for water quality
testing. This research was often revised and revisited. Comprehension played a
key role in the project. After conducting all the necessary research, the team
got together to ensure that all information was not only relevant, but that it
could also help us to direct our study areas to those in which finding/identifying
water hyacinth would be possible. This step was also used to devise the course
maps for the project. Application was the manifestation of our research and
planning. We took everything that we learned and went into the field to collect
our data. Over the course of two days, the team managed to visit 6 different
sites. Three sites were on the New Jersey side of the Delaware River while the
other 3 were on the Pennsylvania side. These sites were chosen after careful
deliberation with the project team. We ensured that all sites had a relative
proximity as well as being easy to navigate to. Reflection was the final step
in completing this capstone. Reflecting on the team’s work, it was evident that
our research could have a long term impact in the quality of our river. After
conducting the project, it was evident that we needed to reach out to other
agencies to ensure that the right people were aware that water hyacinth may
have spread to Pennsylvania as well as New Jersey.
One
major obstacle that presented the project team early on were the effects of the
sequestration. Due to the sequestration, it was unclear at times whether or not
the research project would be able to move forward. Another factor that
affected the project was the equipment needed. The boat that was set to be used
had not yet undergone its inspection and checklist. For this reason, the course
map was redrawn to allow us to visit sites in which we knew water hyacinth
could exist while having access to the shore. In the end, these two factors caused
the project to be conducted from shore instead of using the boat. During the course
of the project, there were often many a time in which other knowledge bases
were needed. Often, I tapped in to my coworkers. They proved invaluable with a plethora
of information about conducting research projects, writing a clear research
paper, and quality assurance standards to use while conducting research.
I
am most proud of the experience given by this capstone. Most students in high
school do not get to conduct their very own research project. Having the experience
of conducting and leading a research team for a project was very exciting. It
showed me a lot about collaboration as well as effective use and consolidation
of resources. When we found that we could not use a specific program or tool,
we quickly turned gear to find another way of doing things. This project has
also taught me a lot about environmental science as a major. It gave me a
deeper understanding to the things that environmental scientist and engineers
do on a daily basis. If I could do this capstone over again, I would change the
timespan of the project. Having the research conducted in two days was
sufficient for the scale of this project however, with a greater timespan, we
could most likely get more locations surveyed.
My
capstone has made SLA a better place because of the people that I have
inspired. When underclassmen would ask me about my capstone, they were
instantly intrigued that I got to lead and conduct a research project. This
also allowed me to network people to bring about more resources and materials
for science learning at SLA.