Su nombre es Greg Jones
Su nombre es Greg Jones. Tiene veintiocho años. Es de México pero vive en Puerto rico. Es delgado y inteligente. Le encanta ir a la escuela y trabajar. No le gusta nada bailar ni jugar videojuegos.
Constitutional question:
The constitutional question here is determining or not if the Federal meat Inspection Act, which basically allows slaughterhouses to keep animals that can’t walk for observation, for evidence of disease, does this prevent a state law that determines animals like that to be immediately killed.
Facts of the case:
· The Federal meat Inspection Act is basically an act that is concerned about animals that are going to become meat.
· Slaughterhouses in California.
· California made there own rules which is basically allowing them to handle or take care of or observe animals that cannot walk.
· The right to purchase animals like any type of receipts was also banned in California.
· Can’t sell meat if the animal was originally with the swine that didn’t allow it to walk.
· The animals that can’t walk are caused by transportation.
· 220,000 swine die during transportation
· 440,000 become unable to walk during transportation.
· Are animals suitable to turn into meat?
· Inspections?
· Humane treatment to animals that can’t walk. Do whatever they want to the animal.
Summary of the Arguments before the SCOTUS:
The argument before SCOTUS appears argues and states the overall points of the case. Mr. Wells, on behalf of the petitioner, states the rules that the California slaughterhouses have given themselves, which is basically handling animals that cannot walk. The case here is argued among Steven J. Wells, Justice Scalia, Justice Kagan, Justice Sotomayor and Justice Alito. One main thing that has come to their attention is the point in which California has banned all receipts for animals. Therefore not allowing any evidence of a purchase from an animal. The situation ended up leading to another case, which involved meat sales, receipts of purchase and such. Meat sales happens to be one of the main steps involved in the process of the slaughterhouse argues one person. Human treatment and food safety are other points made here. How is it that people could sit and sell food yet not knowing much about the health of the animal, this here can lead to health issues among people who buy the meat. The main focus now is the fact as to, why animals are unable to walk, which could be from transportation to the slaughterhouses and could be from the swine disease in, which the animals carry. There were multiple points brought up but the main one had to do with the process in, which animals become unable to walk.
Predictions on the outcome:
I am not sure what to thin actually I mean I completely disagree with the slaughterhouses in California and their rules. I believe they are the ones who will lose the case because of cruelty. Well not exactly cruelty to animals but the point as to, where they are handling and dealing with animals that can’t walk in the way they want to handle them.
In this unit a lot about what really goes on with food processing. From the videos I watched in class to the articles I've read, there are a lot of things that hidden from the public. I think that one of the bigger problems with our food system has to do with people of course, because honestly there isn't any other cause then the people. It's not like the things we eat can cause problems itself, it's the people that makes it, the people that is in charge of the food processing. Not only is it the people who are a part of the food making process, its those who eat the food that aren't speaking out about what's wrong with it. If no one cares about what they are intaking than, what they are eating isn't going to be changed. It also goes under laziness, because some people don't feel like actually preparing a healthy meal, so they rather eat fast food because it is convenient. There are a few changes I could make with some of my eating habits, and some of those things could be instead of eating as much candy as I do I could minimize the sizes. I also have a habit of drinking a lot of teas, so if i could maybe add a few more bottles of water to my diet it would make a difference. There wouldn't be that much sugar in my daily intake, I am more then willing to make the changes. However the only problem would be minimizing the amount of teas I drink, so like I said already I would just add water.
Ingredients
red potatoes
spinach leaves
mozzarella cheese
salt
pepper
onion powder
olive oil
butter
Directions
1. Boil potatoes until soft enough (20-30min)
2. Take potatoes out let them cool
3. Put olive oil in a sauce pan (let it heat)
4. Rinse spinach with water
5. Put the spinach in pan, after about 3min add cheese
6. Add salt, pepper and onion powder (when the cheese is completely melted it is done)
7. Cut a slit in the potatoes big enough to stuff them, and add butter inside so they won't get dry
8. Place potatoes on a baking sheet, and put them in the oven for 5-8min
9. When the potatoes are done, put the spinach in the inside.
10. That's it!
Analysis
The dish I made is more of a side but it can also be a meal if you were to add other ingredients to it. In my dish there aren't that many processed foods. The foods that were processed were the cheese and butter. This dish has a total of about 360 calories, which isn't that bad. However if I was too eat this everyday I would most likely gain a lot of weight, mostly because of the potatoes. Most of the ingredients in this dish are mostly from the U.S, but not all are grown locally. This dish was mostly commercial, but could have been organic. Depending on where the items are being bought, the total of everything should be no more than about 25 dollars at the most. This meal does cost more than fast food, but it still beats eating fast foods everyday. At the end of the day a dish like this a better selection.
- Did the application for a writ of habeas corpus run out of time under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) due to the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review?
¿Como mantener tu identidad en entre tu transformación?
En mi libro la protagonista es un chica, se llama Shauna, que no
recuerdes nada de los últimos seis semanas. Ella estaba en un coma, puede
recordar todos de los acontecimientos recientes, pero ninguno de seis semanas
atrás. Ahora en mi libro la ella esta transformando de una identidad al otra,
usando la ayudar de su familia de que puede confiar.
¿Cuál es el tema central de la novela? (por ejemplo: la realidad
y la fantasía)
Es un libro de realidad, el tema central es superando
todos de los pronósticos y perseverancia.
Hay un tema
subyacente de amor y familia también, cual es importante muy pero no es tan
importante que la otra mensaje o tema.
◦
Concentrando en el tema, ¿hay una pregunta de investigación como una
pregunta esencial que corresponde a la novela? (ejemplo: ¿Es posible encontrar
un ideal en lo real?)
◦
Para mi libro la pregunta de investigación es resistencia o teniendo
la capacidad para adaptarse de una situación malo. Y sí es posible encontrar mi ideal en realidad, no como la
tipa de televisión. Situaciones malos
pasan a menudo en la vida para la mayoría de la gente, incluso los que parecen
como están más rico o justo una situación mejor. Pero los que se van, irse muy
fuerte.
¿Qué paso entre Shauna y su padre?
¿Qué paso al Rudy, su hermano?
¿Cómo va a
sobrevivir cuando ella no sabe lo que pasó en la actualidad?
¿Qué son otros
ejemplos que una buena persona se enmarcada y sin nadie a recurrir?
◦
¿Cuáles son tres ejemplos de la novela que corresponden a la pregunta
de investigación? Escribe las citas directas con los números de la
página.
◦
Ejemplo uno: En el
principio hay una escena donde la protagonista, Shauna, esta hablando con un
terapeuta sobre finalmente visitando su padre, Landon. Ella esta en una relación de
amor odio retorcido que no puede separarse porque de su
hermano, Rudy, que está en peligro.
“Era irónico que
Shauna McAllister hubiera esquivado la muerte para acabar en coma.
-Fácilmente puedo
llegar ahora hasta ella. Estará muerta en una hora.
-No. Cambio de
planes. Nuestra manos están atadas. Te explicaré más tarde, pero por ahora es
mejor que permanezca con vida./¿Y cuando vuelva en sí?
-Con un poco de
suerte, lo habrá olvidado todo.
-Yo no hago negocios
con la suerte.”
(Esta en Página 8)
Ejemplo dos: En
capítulo uno hay un conversación entre Shauna, su tíos y dos doctores. Shauna
justo Susana acaba de despertar de su coma. Los doctores van a
través del protocolo normal, están hacerle preguntas acerca de lo
que ella recuerda, se dan cuenta de algo muy
extraño en su pérdida de memoria. Ella
no recuerda un período de tiempo específico. También le pregunté por
qué se podría haber encontrado rastros de éxtasis en
su sangre. Prácticamente preguntando Shauna si ha cometido
un crimen sin nadie a quien recurrir. Es como que atrapándola en una situación.
“-Quiero
decir cuánto tiempo he estado aquí. Él dudo.
-Seis
semanas.
-¿Seis
semanas?/
-
No recuerdo nada de eso.
-No
es extraño. Él miro su reglo de pulsera.
-14
de octubre. Domingo. Viniste el 1 de septiembre.
-Septiembre.
-Trató
de recordar agosto.
-Nada.
Julio.
-Nada,
Más lejos.
-Nada.
/
Seis
semanas desde…
¿Desde
que?
Viajó
a Guatemala. Eso Fue cuándo, ¿en marzo?
(Esta
en páginas 12-14)
Ejemplo
tres: En
capítulo tres Shauna todavía esta en el hospital con su tía y tío y los
doctores acaba de salir por eso los pueden decirle malas noticias. Les dicen
que Shauna ha sido acusado de herir su hermano y posesión de drogas(éxtasis).
“Y el tío Trent,
Trent Wilde, un amigo de la familia. No es realmente mi tío./ ¿En su casa? La acusación
de Patrice de que había herido a Rudy intencionadamente aterrizó en la mente de
Shauna. / Te acusando de posesión y conducta temeraria.”
(Esta en páginas
24-25)
Me elegí este libro después yo ya
había elegido un otro libro pero fue demasiado difícil, por eso yo cambié a
eso. Yo leí el primero página y el parte posterior de la cubierta, el libro parecía
muy interesante porque se había amor y acción en el mismo libro. Pienso que es
asombroso.
Me gusta mucho del libro y del
tema pero no me gusta la
traducción de Inglés al Español, es muy
enojoso para leer un libro con gramática más peor que la tuya y soy un
estudiante que está aprendiendo español y muchas palabras y nombres que no son
necesarias. Además de que, me gusta mi novela mucha.
Que depende
de su nivel de comprensión y la cantidad de palabras que usted
conoce o si usted tiene una comprensión básica de la lengua
entonces muchos libros como esto serán fáciles. Pero, si usted no sabes muchas
palabras trata entender la mensaje en conjunto después de leyendo la oración.
Luego trata a armar la oración en Inglés, escribe las palabras y frases para
usar luego y si llegar más tarde en su libro.
According to http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lafler-v-cooper/ the case Lafler v. Cooper is about When a criminal defendant turns down a plea offer based on seriously deficient advice from his lawyer, and then receives a harsher sentence after being convicted by a jury after a fair trial, can the defendant later seek to overturn his sentence on the ground that his counsel was unconstitutionally deficient in advising him to reject the more generous plea offer? If so, what is the proper remedy for ineffective assistance of counsel in that situation?
According to http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/Drupal/blogs/blog-entry/lafler-v-cooper-attorney-mistakes-plea-bargaining-and-remedies-09-25-2011 the way this case came about is Among other charges, the respondent, Anthony Cooper, was charged with Assault with Intent to Murder for shooting Kali Mundy and inflicting life-threatening injuries. Although Cooper had aimed the gun at Mundy’s head, the bullets ended up hitting her in the buttocks and thighs. After the preliminary hearings, the prosecutor communicated an initial plea offer to Cooper’s attorney that allowed Cooper to plead guilty to assault with intent to murder and face a minimum sentence of 51 to 85 years imprisonment.
Cooper testified that he wanted to plead guilty but that his attorney advised him not to take the deal. Cooper’s attorney informed him that because the victim was shot below the waist, the government could not prove an assault with intent to commit murder charge. The prosecutor later offered a second plea deal of a minimum sentence of 126 to 210 months but Cooper again rejected the plea based on his attorney’s advice. The case went to trial and the jury found Cooper guilty on all crimes charged. He was sentenced to 185 to 360 months of imprisonment.
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
This goes with is case because this amendment shows that a person on trial has the rite to have a say so in his or her case no matter what even if there is a error and has the rite to speak up. So because a attorney does not make the right decision he or she has the rite to speak up and say he or she objects.
For my Home Style Chicken Soup the ingredients were:
6 cups of chicken broth
1 1/2 pounds of boneless, skinless chicken breast, cubed
1 cup sliced mushrooms
1 red bell pepper, chopped
1 onion, chopped
3 teaspoons minced garlic
2 tablespoons grated fresh ginger
1/2 teaspoon crushed red pepper
Added salt and black pepper
Analysis:-The meal that I made was more whole food than processed foods. Only the broth ingredient was brand name and the other was the packaged chicken breast which is pretty processed.
-Over all the meal itself was not that high in calories. From eating my Home Style Soup I felt nutritiously filled and satisfied by the aroma of flavors and if I had to eat nothing but this soup I could stand it for about a week but other than that the ingredients would not have a substantial impact on your body because it's filled with proteins and organic vegetables.
-Where my ingredients came from I have no clue but from a super market. My mother was nice enough to pick them up herself. I believe that there are no environmental issues with the meal.
- Fast food versus the soup can not compare, the preparation time took 15 minutes, served up to 10-12 people when given in smaller portions, and the cooking time in a Crock-Pot was 3.5 hours. I believe that every corporation benefited from the purchase of my ingredients.
My Personal Reflection of this meal:Personal Reflection