Rebuttal Paper
In our campaign to propose this new amendment, we do see
where those against it might rebuttal. These arguments directly challenging the
mental capabilities of many 16 year olds. Let’s look at the logistics of it. A
great majority, if not all, 16 year olds live with their parents. In fact
they’re mostly still dependent on their parents. Sure 16 year olds may be able
to think for themselves, but don’t have the abilities to be truly
self-sufficient. There’s also the responsibility of 16 years olds. While their
parents may trust them smaller tasks like watch a their sibling or taking out
the trash, one would never give a space of power to a child. They wouldn’t even
know where to begin. Voting is a prime example of that; children don’t know the
first thing about voting and all that goes on behind the scenes. Also, 16 year
olds have many other rights such as the right to drop out of school or in some
other states, the right to marry and have sex. (Debate: Lowering the Voting Age
to 16). While these are freedoms they
can choose express at any time, people against lowering the voting age would
response to this: “Just because they have those rights doesn’t mean they should
express them.” Debatepedia’s article – “Debate:
Lowering the voting age to 16” states: “If all 16 year olds left home at 16 and
started families it would be considered a disaster.” Countries much like
America save things like drinking alcohol, serving in a military, and
especially voting too much higher ages. The streets would be full of drunk and
pregnant teens. In fact in the article: “Lower the Voting Age to 16: Pros and
Cons” from International Business Times
talking about the effects of lowering in voting in other countries. While
countries such as Austria, Nicaragua, Brazil, and Ecuador have been successful
in lowering the voting age, The U.S. and the U.K. alike have failed in such a
process. Now let’s look into other things that could occur if America were to
lowering its voting age. If we are to lowering the voting to 16, many states
could also advocate lowering the criminal responsibility and consent ages to
fit with the lowering voting age. What this basically boils down to is since
you have to power to vote like the adults before you, one should be considered
an adult as well. So, when you are convicted of a crime, even a smaller crime
(theft) for example, instead of being tried a minor you immediately be tried as
an adult. What the article states about age of consent is: “The issue of
consent is particularly important because it extends beyond consensual sex; in
prostitution and rape allegations, if sexual contact is proven and the victim
is a minor, the perpetrator is automatically guilty on statutory rape.” ("Lower the Voting Age to 16: Pros
and Cons). What this means is if the age were
to be lower, the said perpetrator would have to go through a full rape trial
instead. Another reason people are against lowering the voting age is because
they believe that it won’t solve the problem of voter turnout. A plus of
lowering the age is the possibility
of increasing current voter turnout. But that’s all it really is, a
possibility. ("Voting Age, Lowering: Debatabase”). As it stands, in America, voting is a choice. If you don’t
want to vote, you don’t have to. Now considering 16 year olds tend to be more
involved in their own problems rather than what is occurring across the
country, they would most likely be the tiny percentage of people who would
attend the polls. In regards to voter turnout is the political knowledge that
many 16 year olds have. For the most part, that knowledge is little to
nonexistent on a deeper level. Idebate.org
shows how lowering the voting age can be very dangerous. It states that 16 year
olds could use their voting power very naively, only voting for the candidate
they think is cool or that supports a single issue that care about, not looking
at the full picture. ("Debate: Lowering the Voting Age to 16"). The 16 year olds of the present are more concerned with
things like instant gratification and getting/fixing something with the least
amount of effort. The problem with that is it can create the younger voters
into very big swing voters. Say one candidate offers to greatly increase curfew
for those 16-17, but another offers to clean up the streets, teens may most
likely vote for the first guy because they feel that issue he’s addressing
directly effects them, so they care more. But say the second candidate offers
to give free cars to all 16-17 year olds with permits; they instantly change their
opinion to the second candidate because they’re getting free stuff. This can
prove extremely dangerous in America. If this were to happen, America as a
whole could potentially be electing unfit people to run our country. This is
because the demographic of 16-18 years old is just so huge, if they all vote it
could easily outclass all the adults voting, leaving the opinions nearly
nullified. The adults of America already have a hard enough time deciding whom
to vote for and don’t need ignorant teenagers possibly skewing the polls to an
inadequate candidate. Also many teenagers tend to go against the popular
consensus just for the sake of being rebellious. Something like is the very
last we need at the polls. For example, there are two candidates: one obviously
for the job and one obviously not for the job. Where vast majorities of people
agree with the first candidate and they see that he/she is out best interests,
there’s always going to those teenagers who are against the “status quo”.
They’ll simply vote for the second candidate really just because, completely
and utterly ignorant to their politics. And finally there’s the viewpoint of
not all ages groups are affected by things the government tries to pass. Things
like healthcare and social security are things that children should know about
but it’s certainly not something that they should be worrying about. Things like
that are handled by the parents or guardians, and for the most past when
parents vote, they take their entire family into consideration. ("Voting
Age, Lowering: Debatabase”)
Works Cited
"Debate: Lowering the Voting Age to 16." Debatepedia.com.
Debatepedia, 04 Dec. 2009. Web. 02 Nov. 2011.
<http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Lowering_the_voting_age_to_16>.
"Lower the Voting Age to 16: Pros and Cons -
International Business Times."International Business News, Financial
News, Market News, Politics, Forex, Commodities - International Business Times
- IBTimes.com. International Business Times, 19 May 2011. Web. 04 Nov.
2011.
<http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/148691/20110519/lower-the-voting-age-to-16-pros-and-cons.htm>.
"Voting Age, Lowering: Debatabase - Debate Topics and
Debate Motions." IDEA: International Debate Education Association -
Debate Resources & Debate Tools. IDEA Inc., 22 Feb. 2007. Web. 04 Nov.
2011. <http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=588>.
Entire Project: http://tinyurl.com/d7xa5ysf
Reflection Questions:
·
How did you group go about making a decision for what to focus
on for the project?
- We figured we should attack a
subject that would directly affect us, that being letting 16 year-olds vote.
While the object topics are just as important, we felt(or least I did) a more
personal connection to the project.
·
11th grade Essential ? - What is the role of the individual
in creating and sustaining change?
- The role of the individual can
be two things in my opinion: either create change or deter it. For nearly ever
individual trying to make change for the better, there are most likely just as
many individuals trying to stop that change.
·
How has your understanding of the electoral process and whether
or not the US is a democracy evolved during this unit?
- I know so much more than I did before. I never knew that this
is so involved with more than just the presidential candidates on the ballot. I
feel like if I’m ever going to vote I’ve got to know my stuff.
·
How did you decide to best relay a message to a national
audience with your marketing campaign?
- We
decided to go to the audience we are trying to help, teenagers like us. Rather just saying all the positives of letting us vote, let’s see how they’d
feel about it.